<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/09/1080p-charted-viewing-distance-to-screen-size/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/09/1080p-charted-viewing-distance-to-screen-size/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/09/1080p-charted-viewing-distance-to-screen-size/</guid><description><![CDATA[Typically, there is an upper and lower boundary for which the resolution and viewing distance (as a function of screen width) becomes important.<br><br>The idea is that you want to benefit from the additional resolution so as to not see scan-lines or pixels, yet be able to see increasing finer detail in the source material. As such, you want to naturally get closer, but not too close. Getting 'too' close means you are allowing yourself to see the pixels and or scan-lines and that is a distraction and reducing the enjoyment of the viewing.<br><br>So, in order to insure that you don't sit 'too' close to the screen you move back to insure you cannot discern pixels and or scna-lines. That is one boundary. But how far back to you sit? Well, if you sit too far back you lose the ability to see the additional detail provided by the additional resolution. Also, sitting too far back means your view can start to take in things not on the screen.<br><br>If things off of the screen (e.g. speakers, accent plants, frame pictures, etc.) then you can again become distracted. Being distracted from the content reduces the level of enjoyment because you are no longer engulfed or immersed in the content. So, sitting too far back can lead to other kinds of distractions, and this sets up another boundary.<br><br>The THX specification, and others, try to present these boundary concepts in degrees of angle measured to the left and right of a line from the sweet-spot seating position to a point dead-center on the screen. usually the angles have some flexibility, but they do offer some guidelines.<br><br>I think they typically base the recommended seating distance around 1.5 times the width of the screen. For instance, my upstairs theater has an 80" wide screen, and I just happen to sit 120" (10-feet) from it. Any close and I see scan lines. Any farther back and it becomes a boob-tube presentation.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GhostDoggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2006 9:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/09/1080p-charted-viewing-distance-to-screen-size/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/09/1080p-charted-viewing-distance-to-screen-size/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think many reviews have shown that unless your TV is over 60" you wont see the difference between 1080i or 1080p.  My TV's are 32 and 50 so I think I'm covered.  Oh wait, Sony keeps saying that 1080p is the only way to go, but they still make 720p/1080i only tv's...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2006 10:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/09/1080p-charted-viewing-distance-to-screen-size/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/09/1080p-charted-viewing-distance-to-screen-size/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sound and vision ran a story like this months ago.  It does however leave out the fact that 1080p sets generally have better color and contrast ratios compared to 720p sets.  Its not just the extra resolution you're paying for.  So even if you wouldnt see a difference in resolution from a certain distance, the picture would still be better.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Irfan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2006 11:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/09/1080p-charted-viewing-distance-to-screen-size/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/09/1080p-charted-viewing-distance-to-screen-size/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ed,<br><br>Last I checked, Sony is not the only company that markets 1080p TV's  and say that they are "the way to go". (Ever heard of Samsung, Sharp, Pioneer, etc)?<br><br>and when it comes to TV's, Sony has some of the best TV's out in the market(that are fully capable of 1080p)<br><br>You need to separate your obvious bias against Sony and "actual facts"   and...<br><br>stop trolling so much with your HD-DVD petition rants.  If you were confident HD-DVD would win against Blu-Ray(more than likely it will not) you wouldn't need to resort to such silly measures.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2006 5:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/09/1080p-charted-viewing-distance-to-screen-size/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/09/1080p-charted-viewing-distance-to-screen-size/</guid><description><![CDATA[As mentioned above the article only takes into account resolution.  The reality is that in the near future, anything less than 1080p in a hdtv is going to be of much less quality in terms of color saturation, contrast, inputs, and the ability to tweak picture adjustments.  Now I'm not saying you cant get a quality 720p television, but serious home theater consumers will most likely want to fork up the extra money knowing they are getting the top of the line equipment.  As always, you get what you pay for , and it is NOT ONLY RESOLUTION that you are paying for in 1080p.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[billy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2006 9:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/09/1080p-charted-viewing-distance-to-screen-size/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/09/1080p-charted-viewing-distance-to-screen-size/</guid><description><![CDATA[well to me, the real issue is the content, not the display - there just isn't a lot of pure 1080p content available in the marketplace today.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2006 10:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/09/1080p-charted-viewing-distance-to-screen-size/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/09/1080p-charted-viewing-distance-to-screen-size/</guid><description><![CDATA[Have you nothing else in your lives to do than watch tv ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kirk Badger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2006 10:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/09/1080p-charted-viewing-distance-to-screen-size/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/09/1080p-charted-viewing-distance-to-screen-size/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why oh why isn't PC output display ever talked about with 720p vs 1080p discussion?  With the convergence of PC's and the TV...it is going to become more and more common to have PC hooked up to your HDTV.  In fact a home theater PC, might become the centerpiece of your HDTV setup.  Once this happens, then 720p vs 1080p is not about whether I can see the difference when watching movies...it about basic PC screen real estate.  The same reason why someone wants a 20" LCD over a 17".  Do I want to browse the web in 720p or 1080p?  Do I want to interact with YouTube in 720p or 1080p.  In order to display text crisply, the resolution of the display must match the resolution of the video card output.  This is why I will insist on only a 1080p HDTV when it comes time to buy.  Please keep the PC usage involved in the discussion.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Gettler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2006 11:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/09/1080p-charted-viewing-distance-to-screen-size/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/09/1080p-charted-viewing-distance-to-screen-size/</guid><description><![CDATA[Youtube in 1080?!?!? ROTFLMAO<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 12th 2006 9:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/09/1080p-charted-viewing-distance-to-screen-size/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/09/1080p-charted-viewing-distance-to-screen-size/</guid><description><![CDATA[Does my 24inch dell monitor with 1920*1200 resolution come into this equation?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Goobimama]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2006 1:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/09/1080p-charted-viewing-distance-to-screen-size/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/12/09/1080p-charted-viewing-distance-to-screen-size/</guid><description><![CDATA[1080P does not give you extra lines of resolution. Much like a 480P dvd player over a 480i signal. the scan lines are the difference. 1080P is more of a marketing thing than really beneficial to most consumers. Unfortunately, many consumers are easy to deceive and don't understand the difference between interlaced and progressively scanned images. The fact is few HDTV's fully can resolve a 1080i signal, and it gets worse with 1080P sets. I would much rather have a set theat resolves all 1080 lines of resolution than a 1080P set that doesn't]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2006 4:50PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>