Skip to Content
Mark Zolton: Inferior because of less support from CE manufacturers, content providers. 50GB vs. 30GB. Less thruput which means less bitrate for audio and video. HD-DVD IS Inferior to Blu-ray Disc.And HD-DVD is like giving even more money to M$ since they made HDi and VC1.
"And HD-DVD is like giving even more money to M$ since they made HDi and VC1"future blu-ray movies will also be encoded in VC1. early blu-ray releases used mpeg2 and had inferior quality to hd-dvd.
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in:
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Addex @ Oct 13th 2006 2:37PM
Mark Zolton:
Inferior because of less support from CE manufacturers, content providers. 50GB vs. 30GB. Less thruput which means less bitrate for audio and video.
HD-DVD IS Inferior to Blu-ray Disc.
And HD-DVD is like giving even more money to M$ since they made HDi and VC1.
Paul Schmidt @ Oct 14th 2006 2:01PM
"And HD-DVD is like giving even more money to M$ since they made HDi and VC1"
future blu-ray movies will also be encoded in VC1. early blu-ray releases used mpeg2 and had inferior quality to hd-dvd.