Skip to Content
wow. (sarcasm) was that supposed to be impressive? what am i missing?
Well, you seem to be missing the fact that the price for this camera and lens is around 25k, where the same sony and panasonic cameras retail for around 150k without a lens. This camera also does 4:4:4 at 4k. That's Lucas Films quality.
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in:
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Jon @ Oct 3rd 2006 10:13PM
wow. (sarcasm) was that supposed to be impressive? what am i missing?
William @ Oct 4th 2006 12:31PM
Well, you seem to be missing the fact that the price for this camera and lens is around 25k, where the same sony and panasonic cameras retail for around 150k without a lens. This camera also does 4:4:4 at 4k. That's Lucas Films quality.