"Assuming both use VC-1, the Blu-ray version should look better than the HD DVD version. 35gb extra should make a big difference."
Hmmm.... 50GB minus 30GB does not equal 35GB.
If they both use VC-1 then I seriously doubt that Warner will do a different encode at a different bitrate for each format. Plus no word here of Warner even using 50GB Blu-Ray.
"We're still not sure how many people are willing to pay a few extra bucks for a combo disc, but Warner is putting a lot of weight behind them."
Since I want this in a high-def format, I have no choice but to pay extra for the Combo format.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Overseer @ Sep 22nd 2006 8:00AM
"Assuming both use VC-1, the Blu-ray version should look better than the HD DVD version. 35gb extra should make a big difference."
Hmmm.... 50GB minus 30GB does not equal 35GB.
If they both use VC-1 then I seriously doubt that Warner will do a different encode at a different bitrate for each format. Plus no word here of Warner even using 50GB Blu-Ray.
"We're still not sure how many people are willing to pay a few extra bucks for a combo disc, but Warner is putting a lot of weight behind them."
Since I want this in a high-def format, I have no choice but to pay extra for the Combo format.