<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/10/is-dish-network-quietly-adding-inhd-to-their-hd-line-up/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/10/is-dish-network-quietly-adding-inhd-to-their-hd-line-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/10/is-dish-network-quietly-adding-inhd-to-their-hd-line-up/</guid><description><![CDATA[Who see's a little voom for inhd coming soon? :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vince]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 10th 2006 4:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/10/is-dish-network-quietly-adding-inhd-to-their-hd-line-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/10/is-dish-network-quietly-adding-inhd-to-their-hd-line-up/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yawn. INHD sucks. Nothing to get excited about.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc James]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 10th 2006 5:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/10/is-dish-network-quietly-adding-inhd-to-their-hd-line-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/10/is-dish-network-quietly-adding-inhd-to-their-hd-line-up/</guid><description><![CDATA[Marc James, your tastes obviously don't include MLB. INHD has by far the cleanest PQ on ballgames, way better than FAUXSPORTS or even ESPN. IMHO, I wish everyone could see as many HD channels as possible.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[picaso]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 10th 2006 5:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/10/is-dish-network-quietly-adding-inhd-to-their-hd-line-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/10/is-dish-network-quietly-adding-inhd-to-their-hd-line-up/</guid><description><![CDATA[Confirmed - here is some info from TSReader<br><br>Channel 9468<br>On Table_ID: 0x46 (another mux)<br>Service Name: INHD<br>Provider Name: <br>Transport Stream ID: 120 (0x0078) 61.5W 12.501 L 21500 2/3 8PSK (DVB-DSNG/Turbo/DVB-S2), DVB-S<br><br>Descriptor: Linkage Descriptor<br> Transport Stream ID: 129 (0x0081) 61.5W 12.632 R 20000 3/4 QPSK, DVB-S<br> Original Network ID: 4098 (0x1002)<br> Service ID: 36861<br> Linkage Type: Electronic Programme Guide (EPG) service<br>Descriptor: User Private Descriptor: 0x93<br> 25 03                                            %.              <br>Descriptor: User Private Descriptor: 0x86<br> 01 01 23 28 00 fc ff                             ..#(...         <br>Descriptor: User Private Descriptor: 0x84<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stezo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 10th 2006 7:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/10/is-dish-network-quietly-adding-inhd-to-their-hd-line-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/10/is-dish-network-quietly-adding-inhd-to-their-hd-line-up/</guid><description><![CDATA[recent rules action at the FCC prevents companies from witholding programming from various distribution outlets (ie cable co's witholding from satellite co's)<br><br>I don't know if that precipitated some deal between INHD or not.<br><br>There is however one exception to the new rules:  Comcast had its flagship Comcast Sportsnet Philadelphia specically exempted, so you still will not see it anywhere but on cable.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 10th 2006 10:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/10/is-dish-network-quietly-adding-inhd-to-their-hd-line-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/10/is-dish-network-quietly-adding-inhd-to-their-hd-line-up/</guid><description><![CDATA[It was my understanding INHD just dropped INHD2. Could it be they need money to stay alive. I think DISH has shopped their VOOM channels, but cable doesn't see the profit margin in it right now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dslate]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2006 9:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/10/is-dish-network-quietly-adding-inhd-to-their-hd-line-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/10/is-dish-network-quietly-adding-inhd-to-their-hd-line-up/</guid><description><![CDATA[For now, INHD2 is still available in some markets like Las Vegas.  It's been rumoured that INHD2 is going away; but I've never seen an actual press release stating that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Demodave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2006 2:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/10/is-dish-network-quietly-adding-inhd-to-their-hd-line-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/10/is-dish-network-quietly-adding-inhd-to-their-hd-line-up/</guid><description><![CDATA[The most likely scenario is that INHD dropped it's "per digital subscriber" fee to just "per HD subscriber". This has always been the sticking point on getting INHD on the satellite services, INHD has always been available, but the satcos felt a per "digital sub" fee was exorbitant, their position was that since the channel is HD programming, and only HD subs would be able to see the programming, a "HD sub" fee would more accurately reflect viewership.<br><br>I'm sure that the "per digital sub" requirement by INHD was used as leverage to keep INHD off the satcos and give it a measure of exclusivity, but with INHD2 becoming a thing of the past maybe the cablecos felt it was time to get some more exposure. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Keenan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2006 12:27PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>