http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/08/atandts-u-verse-tv-signs-up-starz-hdtv/ Engadget HD Comments for AT&T's U-verse TV signs up Starz HDTV http://www.engadgethd.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadgethd.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/08/atandts-u-verse-tv-signs-up-starz-hdtv/http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/08/atandts-u-verse-tv-signs-up-starz-hdtv/The purchase of AT&T by SBC was to buy the infrastructure, so why is it that my broadband service can only get 1.3 down? In order for you to get an HD singnal over a phone line, they are going to have to do way better than that.
Plus the fact that they partnered with MicroSoft makes me want to run and hide.]]>Aug 8th 2006 10:48PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/08/atandts-u-verse-tv-signs-up-starz-hdtv/http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/08/atandts-u-verse-tv-signs-up-starz-hdtv/Aug 9th 2006 8:57AMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/08/atandts-u-verse-tv-signs-up-starz-hdtv/http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/08/08/atandts-u-verse-tv-signs-up-starz-hdtv/
The only 'AT&T' about U-verse is that SBC chose to use AT&T instead of SBC as the market-branding post purchase of AT&T LD. AT&T contributed nothing to the U-verse project. Complain about your local telephone company and its inability to deliver to you better bandwidth rates.

BTW, I work in the WAN-implementation (core) for a major telephone company about to be eaten up by SBC. Its terrible regarding the chosen methods for delviering video, even with modern compression codecs, on those silly copper-pairs. Its like beating a dead horse two decades after it died.]]>Aug 10th 2006 3:14AM