This should be the standard. HDMI is just to confusing/restrictive/expensive. I don’t see why they cant just let us use these perfectly capable wires to get the HD job done, and let the tech geeks drool over HDMI quality. Forcing HDMI is a real pain, and another reason HD movies will stall.
Why did they choose red? Didn’t anyone else notice that there were already 20 red RCA ports on the back of the receiver/TV/DVD that are not for video?
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
BRYAN @ Jun 27th 2006 10:45AM
This should be the standard. HDMI is just to confusing/restrictive/expensive. I don’t see why they cant just let us use these perfectly capable wires to get the HD job done, and let the tech geeks drool over HDMI quality. Forcing HDMI is a real pain, and another reason HD movies will stall.
Why did they choose red? Didn’t anyone else notice that there were already 20 red RCA ports on the back of the receiver/TV/DVD that are not for video?