Why 1366x768? It was easy. The first 'wide' panels that came out were true WXGA (Wide XGA) that were 1280x768. Fine and dandy for computer monitors, but the 15:9 aspect ratio didn't really work for TVs. The panel makers found it was easier (i.e. get more yield and make more money) to stretch it a little wider rather than cut off some vertical to get to 16:9. And that's how we got 1366x768.
As far as VBI data goes, if you see it, you are under-scanning. Also, you should only see this on SD feeds and all CC and other data is carried in the digital carrier of an HD feed, and not in the visual data.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Bill @ Apr 21st 2006 7:24PM
Why 1366x768? It was easy. The first 'wide' panels that came out were true WXGA (Wide XGA) that were 1280x768. Fine and dandy for computer monitors, but the 15:9 aspect ratio didn't really work for TVs. The panel makers found it was easier (i.e. get more yield and make more money) to stretch it a little wider rather than cut off some vertical to get to 16:9. And that's how we got 1366x768.
As far as VBI data goes, if you see it, you are under-scanning. Also, you should only see this on SD feeds and all CC and other data is carried in the digital carrier of an HD feed, and not in the visual data.
--Bill