<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Let It Wave introduces Super-Resolution Bandelet upconversion technology</title>
<link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/04/12/letitwave-introduces-super-resolution-bandlet-upconversion-techn/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Let It Wave introduces Super-Resolution Bandelet upconversion technology</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Let It Wave introduces Super-Resolution Bandelet upconversion technology]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/04/12/letitwave-introduces-super-resolution-bandlet-upconversion-techn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/04/12/letitwave-introduces-super-resolution-bandlet-upconversion-techn/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes this looks like just the thing that needs to be in everything.  Are they publically traded?  If the processor overhead ain't bad (read: your TV/DVD doesn't have to contain an AMD64 and/or Nvidia/Ati GPU) AND doesn't add delay if using an external DD/DTS decoder.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NNTPgrip]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 12th 2006 4:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Let It Wave introduces Super-Resolution Bandelet upconversion technology]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/04/12/letitwave-introduces-super-resolution-bandlet-upconversion-techn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/04/12/letitwave-introduces-super-resolution-bandlet-upconversion-techn/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'll believe it when I see it.  Please, please be real.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Big Sam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 12th 2006 4:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Let It Wave introduces Super-Resolution Bandelet upconversion technology]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/04/12/letitwave-introduces-super-resolution-bandlet-upconversion-techn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/04/12/letitwave-introduces-super-resolution-bandlet-upconversion-techn/</guid><description><![CDATA[It looks like Fractal compression technology. Just as programs like Genuine Fractals can increase a image size 800% without noticeable lost of details, I'm sure "bandlets" is using similar technology in moving images.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 13th 2006 12:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Let It Wave introduces Super-Resolution Bandelet upconversion technology]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/04/12/letitwave-introduces-super-resolution-bandlet-upconversion-techn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/04/12/letitwave-introduces-super-resolution-bandlet-upconversion-techn/</guid><description><![CDATA["800% without noticeable loss of details"...?<br><br>what people do not understand is that when you start with less resolution, it does not matter how much software or hardware behind a scaled image, you are NOT going to get more detail. I hope you are only trying to say "without noticeable gain in artifact" which would be far more appropriate.<br><br>a good example would be a pair of brown pants pictured in SD - when seen in HD you notice that they are actually brown corduroys. it does not matter how good Genuine Fractals or Super Bandlet technology is - if it isn't there to begin with, it isn't going to be there afterwards.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2006 8:41AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>