Motion picture, whether it's 16mm, 35mm, or whatever, when considered "motion picture" - is shot as 24 Frames per Second (fps).
SD - standard definition - TV, that is, Television VIDEO, is 30fps.
In order to transfer from 24fps to 30fps, a process called "3-2 Pulldown" is used, whereby those 6 MISSING frames are adapted to meet the frame rate so we don't get flicker and/or stutter-rapid motion in the picture......., so that the motion is smooth, as if the frames would be projected on a movie screen with a 24fps projector.......
Unless a DIRECT film-to-HD transfer is conducted (as compared to film-to-SD), the quality will always be inferior when the SD is up-converted to HD - it's going to look like crap, kinda like what you see now when you watch a SD broadcast on an HD monitor as you flick through the channels.... I am sure you have noticed..... and it will still be immensely inferior to 35mm - because the 16mm frame is that much smaller than the 35mm frame and has less information on it.... compare this the pixel counts in your digital cameras - it's the same idea.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
UAK @ Mar 23rd 2006 3:51PM
"16mm still has a higher resolution than SD."
Nope, it isn't.
Motion picture, whether it's 16mm, 35mm, or whatever, when considered "motion picture" - is shot as 24 Frames per Second (fps).
SD - standard definition - TV, that is, Television VIDEO, is 30fps.
In order to transfer from 24fps to 30fps, a process called "3-2 Pulldown" is used, whereby those 6 MISSING frames are adapted to meet the frame rate so we don't get flicker and/or stutter-rapid motion in the picture......., so that the motion is smooth, as if the frames would be projected on a movie screen with a 24fps projector.......
Unless a DIRECT film-to-HD transfer is conducted (as compared to film-to-SD), the quality will always be inferior when the SD is up-converted to HD - it's going to look like crap, kinda like what you see now when you watch a SD broadcast on an HD monitor as you flick through the channels.... I am sure you have noticed..... and it will still be immensely inferior to 35mm - because the 16mm frame is that much smaller than the 35mm frame and has less information on it.... compare this the pixel counts in your digital cameras - it's the same idea.