With games beeing action packed I think you can say that a progressive scan picture is more desireable in gaming... We know that progressive scan is better for that type of content.
That leaves us with 720P and 1080P. But you have to be more specific and get in to framerates like this article talks about. I think the more important thing for a gamer is framerates... all those pixels aren't that glorious if I'm not pulling enough fps. For a fast action game like halo 2 (or 3) I would say that 720P/60FPS would be more adventageous than 1080P/30FPS. Of course this is all speculation as I haven't seen and played 1080P.
Now when we are able to play 1080P/60FPS.... oh man, will that be great!
PS, when playing halo 2 on my 360 if there is too much action on the screen my framerate will drop noticeably. Anybody else have that?
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
tommiwan @ Feb 22nd 2006 9:50AM
With games beeing action packed I think you can say that a progressive scan picture is more desireable in gaming... We know that progressive scan is better for that type of content.
That leaves us with 720P and 1080P. But you have to be more specific and get in to framerates like this article talks about. I think the more important thing for a gamer is framerates... all those pixels aren't that glorious if I'm not pulling enough fps. For a fast action game like halo 2 (or 3) I would say that 720P/60FPS would be more adventageous than 1080P/30FPS. Of course this is all speculation as I haven't seen and played 1080P.
Now when we are able to play 1080P/60FPS.... oh man, will that be great!
PS, when playing halo 2 on my 360 if there is too much action on the screen my framerate will drop noticeably. Anybody else have that?