http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/01/06/ces-first-generation-blu-ray-players-may-not-be-full-featured/ Engadget HD Comments for http://www.engadgethd.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadgethd.com en-us Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/01/06/ces-first-generation-blu-ray-players-may-not-be-full-featured/http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/01/06/ces-first-generation-blu-ray-players-may-not-be-full-featured/Jan 6th 2006 4:56PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2006/01/06/ces-first-generation-blu-ray-players-may-not-be-full-featured/http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/01/06/ces-first-generation-blu-ray-players-may-not-be-full-featured/Jan 6th 2006 8:53PMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2006/01/06/ces-first-generation-blu-ray-players-may-not-be-full-featured/http://www.engadgethd.com/2006/01/06/ces-first-generation-blu-ray-players-may-not-be-full-featured/


#1 "All this talk of Blu-Ray and HD-DVD kind of makes me want to go buy a D-VHS"



All this talk of Blu-Ray and HD-DVD kind of makes me want to go buy Standard DVDs!



Another proof 95% or so of the general public won't ever waste money on HD-discs of any format.. When was the last time any one went to a movie theatre and said, "Wow! Look at that beautiful 70mm movie image!"



Most movies are still recorded on 35mm film, but 70mm offers by far, a much better image than HD-DVD does over standard DVDs. Simple basic math... Divide a 35mm frame into 720 x 480 units (pixels). 70mm film has 4 times the area of 35mm so that gives 2880 x 1920 units (pixels), much more than HD is presently offering!



Be very leary of any one who claims they see a 'big difference' in DVD formats. Rather, be wise, compare for yourself, that's the best and only way!

]]>Jan 7th 2006 3:12AM