<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for The number 1 HDTV myth</title>
<link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/11/21/the-number-1-hdtv-myth/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for The number 1 HDTV myth</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The number 1 HDTV myth]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/11/21/the-number-1-hdtv-myth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/11/21/the-number-1-hdtv-myth/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think your #1 myth is a bit inaccurate, or at least a bit deceptive.  While the government is not forcing all OTA channels to be HD within a certain timeframe, they absolutely DO have a deadline to move to the digital frequencies -- and they absolutely WILL cut off OTA analog signals by that deadline.  The government wants that frequency spectrum badly - hence the governments deadlines and drop dead dates.  While there is no guarantee that OTA will be in high-def on those dates, they will be transmitting a digital signal at a frequency that current analog TVs will not be able to receive.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2005 10:47AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>