http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/28/rca-is-wobul-ing-too/ Engadget HD Comments for RCA is wobul-ing too http://www.engadgethd.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadgethd.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/28/rca-is-wobul-ing-too/http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/28/rca-is-wobul-ing-too/Oct 28th 2005 11:12AMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/28/rca-is-wobul-ing-too/http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/28/rca-is-wobul-ing-too/
I'll buy a Sony SXRD tommarrow if they show me one with at least 3 or 4 HDMI inputs that support 1080p, 3 or 4 component inputs (instead of 2), and a Cablecard 2.0 slot. (As long as someone can tell me that if the cable cos. switch to MPEG-4, I won't have to have a Cablecard 3.0 slot to take the new card - I mean damn, its just a PCMCIA slot, lets allow for TV firmware updates that the user can install)]]>Oct 28th 2005 11:22AMhttp://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/28/rca-is-wobul-ing-too/http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/28/rca-is-wobul-ing-too/
I dislike the idea of wobulation just as much, but I'd like to point out that both implementations display 720 lines NATIVELY. It is the horizontal resolution that is doubled using wobulation. Why we emphsize only the vertical resolution in this age of digital TV is another discussion.]]>Oct 28th 2005 1:56PM