<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Wobulation: solid pic or shaky science?</title>
<link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/17/wobulation-solid-pic-or-shaky-science/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Wobulation: solid pic or shaky science?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Wobulation: solid pic or shaky science?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/17/wobulation-solid-pic-or-shaky-science/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/17/wobulation-solid-pic-or-shaky-science/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why not? It's great to see new technologies for higher definition. The competition that it could potentially create would mean that all HDTVs would drop in price. It seems to me that this technology could get high definition with a low number of pixels.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 19th 2005 2:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Wobulation: solid pic or shaky science?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/17/wobulation-solid-pic-or-shaky-science/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/17/wobulation-solid-pic-or-shaky-science/</guid><description><![CDATA[It sounds like interlacing in the projection stage.  If all they're doing is shifting the pixels a bit, and refreshing the image, the result would be roughly the affect of a blur filter.  It might make the screen door appear to go away, but all it would really do is make each pixel a little less discreet.  Sounds like a bad plan to me.  Work on making the spaces between pixels go away, and you solve the jaggies problem AND have a clearer picture.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 20th 2005 1:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Wobulation: solid pic or shaky science?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/17/wobulation-solid-pic-or-shaky-science/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/17/wobulation-solid-pic-or-shaky-science/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just stumbled accrossed this odd term. Not hearing it before caught me by suprise. I'd have to agree with andy's comment. Considering the jumps in clarity in the last few years, this seems pale really in comparison, and reminds me of the early days of monitors doing interlacing to update the screen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rolf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 20th 2005 5:51PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>