<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for HD Beat Review: Sony KDS-R50XBR1</title>
<link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for HD Beat Review: Sony KDS-R50XBR1</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Sony KDS-R50XBR1]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</guid><description><![CDATA[This HDTV does not accept a 1080p signal.  However, it does accept a 1080i signal, which it then de-interlaces to display as a 1080p picture.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Moe32274]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 10th 2005 2:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Sony KDS-R50XBR1]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just bought this TV.Hooked it up and the picture for standard channels is VERY BLURRY? Any suggestions? HD is awesome, but not all channels are HD. Incidentally we have the direct TV HD receiver as well.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Diomede]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2005 8:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Sony KDS-R50XBR1]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Same comment as 7. above. I just viewed the KDSR50XBR1 at Circuit City. The picture on Satellite HD was really great. I then had the sales guy hook it up to non-HD channels, and the picture was terrible. Ghosting all over the place. and no contrast. He said it was because of "weak signal". I dont know if that waas true or not. What are other people's experience with non-HD channels using this TV ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Meurig Davies]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2005 12:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Sony KDS-R50XBR1]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Meurig, when you went to Circuit City, did you compare the non-HD signal against other rear-projection sets. I agree, the non-HD signals do not look great; they never have on large screen sets. Like I said in the review, the signal is not great but not any worse then other sets. Plus, the coax feeds at Circuit City are very week and will produce ghosting because if it. Trust me, I know about Circuit City.<br><br>Suggestions for Mark...I really do not have any to improve existing stations. If you use an antenna though to pick up your locals, you will get a better picture even if the program is just 480p.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Burns]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2005 12:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Sony KDS-R50XBR1]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</guid><description><![CDATA[I really want this set!!! but I just cant spend that much on a 1080p tv that wont except a 1080p signal. How will this set handle a true 1080p signal?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BARK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2005 12:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Sony KDS-R50XBR1]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Matt, thanks for the response. However, at the moment I am kind of "in limbo". I actually went in to Circuit City to buy the Sony KDLV40XBR1 LCD flat panel. (Had my wife talked in to letting me buy it and all...). I really like that model, but my only reservation has been screen size, and I have been hesitating because of it. It's the largest direct view flat panel LCD Sony make, but it's still only 40 ". Grrrrr ! What I REALLY want is a 50" screen for my TV room. That's when the Sales guy suggested the rear projection 50" SXRD. I had read up on the SXRD previously, but discounted it because generally I think the picture quality of the rear projection models (on HD) are not as crisp and sharp as the direct view flat panel LCDs. BUT, when I viewed the KDS-R50XBR1, the picture quality (on HD) blew me away. It is really good, compared to other rear projection TVs I've seen. I guess LCoS works, and I could be tempted to go for it. However, since most channels are not HD yet, it really needs to produce a sharp picture with standard input signals, and from what I have seen so far, and read here, I am not convinced that it can do that. So, I guess I am now waiting until :<br>1) I can be convinced that the 50" Sony IS in fact capable of a (reasonably) crisp picture with standard input,<br>or,<br>2) They produce one that is<br>or,<br>3) Sony comes out with a 50", or maybe even a 46" LCD flat panel direct view model in the near future. That's what I would REALLY like. Any word on that for the new year ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Meurig Davies]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2005 12:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Sony KDS-R50XBR1]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just bought the KDS-R50XBR1 this past weekend. After tuning with Avia, I am impressed. For the benefit of some of the posters here I'll just say one thing: garbage in, garbage out. Feed this beast a good HD or DVD signal and you are in for a treat. Give it MPEG2 compressed Noggin and you will be disappointed (as you would be with any of these large view screens). And for those of you waiting on technology, you'll always be waiting for something better. Get off the pot and buy what you like so I don't have to listen to you spew about how something sucks because what is going to come out tomorrow is going to be better. Blacks are black on this set and colors are richly saturated (again, with a good signal). Everyone needs to realize that not all content is equal. Motion pictures are mastered darker with less dynamic range per scene then say, Trading Spaces. Any set is going to have trouble looking good when the camera is fighting bad lighting. When shopping for one of these guys, don't bother trying to compare a TV feed, as they are ususally split and degregaded to hell. Kindly ask the sales folk to hook up a DVD player and compare the same disk on multiple units. Sure, you are not going to see true HD, but you will be able to better tell how a set handles black and white levels, motion, color accuracy, etc.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chad Wadsworth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2005 12:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Sony KDS-R50XBR1]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have to say I agree with Chad #12 above. I own the 50 in sony, as he does, and the picture is literally awesome in HD. So rich and full, with zero pixilation. I find the basic signals quite tolerable, the HD channels "out of this world", and DVD's awesome. So much talk about blue ray dvds, but not much talk about how great this set looks in today's HD. Maybe we should bring the actors into our living room, lol. With today's moving technology, you can always wait til tomorrow for the latest and greatest, but a person only has so much time to live. I hooked up a Polk home theatre system, and it is just like being in the movie theatre.  This is the best entertainment investment I have made. <br>bwanatom]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tom bwana]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 27th 2005 1:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Sony KDS-R50XBR1]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have had the KDS-R50XBR1 for a few weeks now and am quite pleased with it.  I was wondering if any other owners have noticed a problem with washed out blacks in the lower left hand corner of their screen?  I notice this when viewing a 4:3 picture with black bars on the left and right and also when viewing a 16:9 picture with black bars at the top and bottom of the screen.  Otherwise, the blacks in the picture itself are great.  Just wondering if this is the norm or if my set may be defective or require some adjustment.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2005 6:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Sony KDS-R50XBR1]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great TV...2 questions though...<br><br>1) I cannot get even standard broadcast signals to display in 4:3. (I've tried all the menu selections.) It's no big deal becasue the 'Full' screen always look great, but am I missing something?<br><br>2) Sometimes the image goes offscreen. (Ex.: The NBC peacock is only partially visible in the lower right corner. Seems to be only some channels. I see no way to make any adjustment. It happens in any picture mode. Again, am I missing something?<br><br>Thanks]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 6th 2005 2:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Sony KDS-R50XBR1]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great TV...2 questions though...<br><br>1) I cannot get even standard broadcast signals to display in 4:3. (I've tried all the menu selections.) It's no big deal becasue the 'Full' screen always look great, but am I missing something?<br><br>2) Sometimes the image goes offscreen. (Ex.: The NBC peacock is only partially visible in the lower right corner. Seems to be only some channels. I see no way to make any adjustment. It happens in any picture mode. Again, am I missing something?<br><br>Thanks]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 6th 2005 2:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Sony KDS-R50XBR1]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great TV...2 questions though...<br><br>1) I cannot get even standard broadcast signals to display in 4:3. (I've tried all the menu selections.) It's no big deal becasue the 'Full' screen always look great, but am I missing something?<br><br>2) Sometimes the image goes offscreen. (Ex.: The NBC peacock is only partially visible in the lower right corner. Seems to be only some channels. I see no way to make any adjustment. It happens in any picture mode. Again, am I missing something?<br><br>Thanks]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 6th 2005 2:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Sony KDS-R50XBR1]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great TV...2 questions though...<br><br>1) I cannot get even standard broadcast signals to display in 4:3. (I've tried all the menu selections.) It's no big deal becasue the 'Full' screen always look great, but am I missing something?<br><br>2) Sometimes the image goes offscreen. (Ex.: The NBC peacock is only partially visible in the lower right corner. Seems to be only some channels. I see no way to make any adjustment. It happens in any picture mode. Again, am I missing something?<br><br>Thanks]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 6th 2005 2:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Sony KDS-R50XBR1]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</guid><description><![CDATA[To set the 4:3 default for standard broadcast signals or any of the video connections, select Menu, Screen (should be 3rd choice down), 4:3 Default, Normal.  You can then use the Wide button on the remote to cycle through the widescreen selections.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2005 8:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Sony KDS-R50XBR1]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</guid><description><![CDATA[It would be interesting to tell us what 1080i HD would look on it as after all, that is the only reason why someone would buy that tv]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Leon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 15th 2005 4:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Sony KDS-R50XBR1]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am assuming that you are refering to 1080p rather then 1080i. And trust me, I wish I could see it but there is nothing out there right now that has that type of content. There are some Windows Media HD clips but I had no way of getting them on the screen with my test equipment. <br><br>Even if you are refering to 1080i there is not much difference between 720p and 1080i due to frame rates. 720p is 60 frames a second and can make a smoother image while 1080i is 30 frames but has a higher resolution; on a 50-inch size there is not much of a difference. Plus, when you add in MPEG 2 compression thanks to DirecTV, there is NO difference. That is why they are upgrading to MPEG 4]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Burns]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 15th 2005 4:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Sony KDS-R50XBR1]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</guid><description><![CDATA[I may be mistaken, but I thought I read that this model can upconvert to 1080p but not display a 1080p signal. Anyone who buys this RPTV might not be happy once BluRay, etc. comes out next year. Something about the display is 1080p but not all the circuitry.<br><br>RK]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Kinley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 16th 2005 11:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Sony KDS-R50XBR1]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</guid><description><![CDATA[What about screen geometry? I noticed in your picture of the on screen menu that the menu itself did not appear perfectly square. One more thing, did you observe the picture with the iris at its lowest setting? I've read that although this setting has the narrowest contrast level, it delivers the deepest blacks. I'm very interested in using this TV with its main duty to be for videogames and horror movies(yeah, I refuse to grow up). Any comments would be appreciated.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lance Wethey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 17th 2005 7:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Sony KDS-R50XBR1]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</guid><description><![CDATA[If this TV had a true 1080P input capability over HDMI, I would buy it in a heartbeat.  It is a damn shame that this beautiful set must upconvert every signal it receives.  A crying shame.<br><br>Does anybody know if the Qualia 006.<br><br>Too bad the HP is the only TV that will do this, and it is a wobbler.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[H60Ace]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 29th 2005 7:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Beat Review: Sony KDS-R50XBR1]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/10/15/hd-beat-review-sony-kds-r50xbr1/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just bought the KDS-R50XBR1 and I don't yet have access to a digital signal (switching from sat to cable due to equipment bumps and a narrow access window to satellites.)<br><br><br><br>In the review I see stated: "This XBR however, allows the common man to access the holy grail of TV adjustments: Sony’s DRC palette."<br><br><br><br>Is access to the "Advanced Video" settings shown somehow context sensitive? I don't see the options in my menu tree and I was wondering if they are only available if the set detects a digital signal.<br><br><br><br>Thanks, and happy holidays to all.<br><br><br><br>Larry]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 24th 2005 8:21AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>