<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for VOOM HDTV is reborn</title>
<link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/08/25/voom-hdtv-is-reborn/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for VOOM HDTV is reborn</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on VOOM HDTV is reborn]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/08/25/voom-hdtv-is-reborn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/08/25/voom-hdtv-is-reborn/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh boy! More Voom HD channels not worth watching!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bloggator]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 25th 2005 3:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on VOOM HDTV is reborn]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/08/25/voom-hdtv-is-reborn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/08/25/voom-hdtv-is-reborn/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hang on. Moving from MPEG 2 to MPEG 4.<br>That means a higher degree of compression will be used, which will mean a less clear picture:(.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 25th 2005 5:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on VOOM HDTV is reborn]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/08/25/voom-hdtv-is-reborn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/08/25/voom-hdtv-is-reborn/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can the existing HD Dish Network set top boxes decode MPEG4 currently?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Jeremy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 25th 2005 5:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on VOOM HDTV is reborn]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/08/25/voom-hdtv-is-reborn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/08/25/voom-hdtv-is-reborn/</guid><description><![CDATA[No can do Jeremy; current Dish boxes are MPEG-2 compliant. I've asked Dish how they intend to upgrade but haven't received a real answer yet.<br><br>Ian: more compression doesn't necessarily mean less quality. Compare uncompressed DVDs to MPEG-2; quality is similar but storage space is less for MPEG-2. This is a good thing: if MPEG-4 can compress better (i.e., use less bandwidth), you can fit more channels on the same infrastructure. That's how Dish will fit the extra VOOM channels; it won't require an additional satellite.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 25th 2005 6:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on VOOM HDTV is reborn]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/08/25/voom-hdtv-is-reborn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/08/25/voom-hdtv-is-reborn/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's not more compression, it's better compression, so that they can fit more channels in the same bandwidth with the same quality.<br><br>Here's a nice article comparing MPEG 2 & 4:<br>http://graphics.tomshardware.com/video/20000913/dvd-05.html]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant Guthrie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 26th 2005 2:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on VOOM HDTV is reborn]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/08/25/voom-hdtv-is-reborn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/08/25/voom-hdtv-is-reborn/</guid><description><![CDATA[The more HD content the better!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan Campbell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 26th 2005 2:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on VOOM HDTV is reborn]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/08/25/voom-hdtv-is-reborn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/08/25/voom-hdtv-is-reborn/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice blog.I read some of you're articles and they are really nice.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tedd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2005 2:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on VOOM HDTV is reborn]]></title><link>http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/08/25/voom-hdtv-is-reborn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgethd.com/2005/08/25/voom-hdtv-is-reborn/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why won't these companies release an HD only package?  I really don't care for the 200+ other channels they have.  I just want HDTV and the last thing I want to do is pay through the nose for it.  I think paying $20 per month is a decent price for getting only the 21 HD Channels without the hassle.  Maybe it is just me.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 27th 2005 10:31AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>